In what may well have been expected given somewhat negative briefing papers from US Food and Drug Administration staff ahead of an advisory panel meeting yesterday, the verdict was that the benefits of GlaxoSmithKline's (LSE: GSK) Avodart (dutasteride) and Merck & Co's (NYSE: MRK) Proscar (finasteride) fail to outweigh their risks in preventing prostate cancer in certain men (The Pharma Letter November 30).
Both Avodart and Proscar are already approved for the treatment of enlarged prostate, and studies by both companies showed their drugs decreased incidence of low-grade prostate tumors by nearly 25%. However, reports ABC News, panelists voiced concern that a small number of men taking the drugs actually developed more aggressive tumors, compared with those given a placebo. Panelists said the risk of increasing fatal tumors outweighed the benefit of reducing tumors that are seldom fatal.
"In a setting like this, the onus is on the drug to be completely safe, and to show benefit, and I don't think it reached that level," said FDA Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee chairman Wyndham Wilson, of the National Cancer Institute.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze