US federal rules and regulations related to transparency of prescription drug studies and prohibitions on off-label marketing are the focus of papers in the December 2011 issue of Health Affairs. In addition, a separate study examines the effect of prior authorization restrictions on the use of antipsychotic drugs.
A brief summary of each of the three papers follows:
Despite a 2007 law requiring that certain prescription drug clinical trials be registered on the public database ClinicalTrials.gov, fewer than one in eight studies are reported within one year of being completed, write Michael Law and colleagues from the University of British Columbia. Surprisingly, clinical trials funded by the pharmaceutical industry are three times more likely than trials funded by the National Institute of Health to disclose results on the site. An incomplete record of trial results could skew the information that trials provide, the authors state. They call for additional enforcement of reporting requirements to enable more comprehensive and less biased studies and meta-analyses of the clinical efficacy, off-label use, and safety of prescription drugs
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze