By Barbara Obstoj-Cardwell. Editor
The UK’s medicines cost-effectiveness watchdog the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has come in for a lot of criticism for negative decisions, particularly with regards to new cancer drugs, and last week’s rejection of Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Opdivo was no exception.
Max Jacobs, an analyst at Edison Investment Research, commented:“NICE is really embracing the moniker ‘death panel’ in its rejection of revolutionary, life-saving drug, Opdivo, despite its unequivocally positive data for lung cancer and despite the fact that Bristol-Myers was offering to pay for treatment lasting over one year. Opdivo offers lung cancer patients treatment that is significantly more effective than the current standard chemotherapy regimen but with far less side effects. Clearly NICE is focusing on the cost and not the benefit.”
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze