Negative NICE appraisal for Eli Lilly’s Alimta as maintenance therapy

27 February 2014

UK health care guidance body the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has published final draft guidance that does not recommend US pharma major Eli Lilly’s (NYSE: LLY) Alimta (pemetrexed) for the maintenance treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in people whose disease has not progressed immediately following induction therapy with pemetrexed and cisplatin.

Commenting on the draft recommendations, Sir Andrew Dillon, chief executive of the NICE, said: “NICE already recommends pemetrexed for maintenance treatment following a different first-line drug. However, in this case, pemetrexed as maintenance treatment following first-line pemetrexed therapy in combination with cisplatin, although effective, did not offer sufficient benefit to justify the costs. It is disappointing not to be able to recommend pemetrexed in this final draft guidance, but we can only recommend treatments which are both clinically and cost effective.”

The draft guidance is now with consultees, who have the opportunity to appeal against it. Until the NICE issues final guidance, National Health Service bodies should make decisions locally on the funding of specific treatments. This appraisal is concerned with an extension to the marketing authorization for the maintenance indication approved in 2012 which includes pemetrexed as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed and cisplatin.

The NICE already recommends pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin as a first-line treatment option for certain types of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and as a maintenance treatment option for locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC if the disease has not progressed immediately following platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with gemcitabine, paclitaxel or docetaxel.

Treatment costs

During consultation on the second ACD, the manufacturer submitted a revision to its base case ICER (Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio). The revision resulted in an ICER ranging between £58,918 per QALY gained and £68,771 per QALY (Quality Adjusted Life Year) gained. The lower and upper estimates of this range were based on two alternative assumptions concerning the benefit of pemetrexed over placebo in the post treatment period. However, when the evidence review group reviewed the data for the post treatment period and explored the manufacturer’s economic model, it estimated the ICER to be £74,500 ($124,318) per QALY gained.

This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free.  A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.

Login to your account

Become a subscriber

 

£820

Or £77 per month

Subscribe Now
  • Unfettered access to industry-leading news, commentary and analysis in pharma and biotech.
  • Updates from clinical trials, conferences, M&A, licensing, financing, regulation, patents & legal, executive appointments, commercial strategy and financial results.
  • Daily roundup of key events in pharma and biotech.
  • Monthly in-depth briefings on Boardroom appointments and M&A news.
  • Choose from a cost-effective annual package or a flexible monthly subscription
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed

Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK



Companies featured in this story

More ones to watch >


Today's issue

Company Spotlight





More Features in Pharmaceutical