The mandate to conduct routine comparative clinical efficacy studies for biosimilar medicines, compounded by duplicative regional requirements, serves as a barrier to greater medicine access for patients, said the trade group International Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association (IGBA).
The IGBA has issued two position papers; the first proposing streamlined development through reduced clinical studies and the second proposing use of the same comparator product across jurisdictions. Avoiding scientifically unnecessary studies, and their repetition using locally sourced reference materials, does not compromise the quality, safety and efficacy of the approved biosimilar medicines. This can facilitate more efficient development of more affordable medicines, enabling biosimilar access for more patients in more jurisdictions (see IQVIA Biosimilar Void report).
Importance of educating all stakeholders
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze