Continuing its battle against pay-for-delay between drug originators and generic makers, the US Federal Trade Commission revealed yesterday that it has filed an amicus brief before the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in support of private class action plaintiffs who have challenged the legality of patent settlements between branded and generic manufacturers.
The basis of such accords is that drug originators make payments to the generic drugmaker in return for dropping challenges to a patent and establish a date when the non-branded version of the compound can be sold. The FTC’s Chairman Jon Leibowitz has long argued that such “collusive deals” are costing US consumers as much as $3.5 billion in higher medicines prices (The Pharma Letters passim).
A recent FTC staff report found that the number of these deals skyrocketed more than 60%, from 19 in fiscal year 2009 to 31 in FY 2010 (TPL May 5). Overall, the agreements reached in the latest fiscal year involved 22 different brand-name pharmaceutical products with combined annual US sales of about $9.3 billion, the report stated.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze