The Center for Medicine in the Public Interest, whose co-directors wrote an oped in the Washington Times newspaper that was fairly favorable about the Enzi-Kennedy bill (nicknamed Kenzi), claims to have now found several flaws in the legislation which, if left unadressed, would compromise the bill's desirability. "We were warned that, despite some of the more forward looking elements of the first draft of the bill made available, we might want to revise our remarks (that is, eat our words) after the full draft of the bill came out)," said Robert Goldberg, the CMPI's vice president.
The current draft contains major flaws, according to Dr Goldberg, including: the requirement of a risk management plan for all drugs; a clinical trials registry that "makes no scientific sense" because it undermines patent rights; and "ignoring the advanced technologies that will make medicines safer in the future."
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze