Britain's Glaxo announced on July 22 that it has instituted patent infringement proceedings regarding its leading antiulcerant Zantac (ranitidine) against the Canadian generic drugmaker Novopharm (in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Raleigh Division). And on July 23, Novopharm initiated action to sue Glaxo for $300 million in potential lost sales and punitive damages for delaying it from launching a generic form of Zantac.
Glaxo that says Novopharm notified it in June that it had filed a Form 1 version of ranitidine hydrochloride. In accordance with the provisions of the Waxman-Hatch Act (which provides an accelerated procedure for the approval of generic drugs upon patent expiry), Novopharm has certified to Glaxo that it will not market a generic product prior to the expiration in December 1995 of Glaxo's basic US patent on ranitidine HCl.
It has further certified that such a product would not infringe Glaxo's US product patent on Form 2 ranitidine HCl, which expires in the year 2002.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze