The US Supreme Court yesterday granted Swiss drugmaker Helsinn’s petition for certiorari to review a Federal Circuit Panel decision, holding that certain patent claims covering Aloxi (palonosetron hydrochloride) injection are not valid and are not infringed by Israeli generics drug giant Teva Pharmaceutical Industries’ (NYSE: TEVA) generic palonosetron product.
In March this year, Helsinn and partner Eisai (TYO: 4523), which markets Aloxi, a treatment for chemotherapy-induced nausea, in the USA, said they had asked the Supreme Court “to consider whether, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, the definition of what qualifies to invalidate a patent has changed.”
America Invents Act, the definition of what qualifies to invalidate a patent has changed. More specifically, Helsinn asked the Supreme Court to consider whether, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, an inventor’s sale of an invention to a third party that is obligated to keep the invention confidential is an act that can invalidate a patent, which is a question that the courts are addressing for the first time.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze