The UK Parliament heard a second reading of the Intellectual Property Bill in the House of Commons yesterday, following a first reading last August.
The bill, which stems from recommendations outlined in the Hargreaves Review of Intellectual Property and Growth, an independent review of the UK’s IP strategy, was approved by the House of Lords, the upper chamber of the UK Parliament, last year.
Commenting on the implications the IP bill for the pharma sector, Gareth Williams (pictured), a partner of leading intellectual property firm Marks & Clerk, said: “The majority of the Bill – and indeed the majority of the debate yesterday – was concerned with the amendments to registered design law, which, while of concern to SMEs [small and medium-sized enterprises] in the creative industries is perhaps less so to the medtech sector.”
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze