There was mixed news this morning from the UK’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), when the agency published final guidance on AstraZeneca’s (LSE: AZN) breast cancer drug Faslodex (fulvestrant) and Roche’s (ROG; SIX) RoActemra (tocilizumab) in young children.
The final guidance for the National Health Service in England and Wales, which confirms a previous guidance (The Pharma Letter November 10), concludes that Faslodex does not work significantly better than existing treatments, and so its widespread use on the NHS would not be an effective use of resources.
Although AstraZeneca estimated that fulvestrant could extend life when compared to using the aromatase inhibitors currently prescribed, anastrozole and letrozole, the NICE’s independent committee found these estimates to be considerably uncertain. The Committee concluded that it had not been given any conclusive evidence that fulvestrant extends life or delays tumor progression any more than aromatase inhibitor therapy.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze