Health care executives from around the UK have voiced strong support for the economic value of medicines to modern society at the 18th annual Pharma Times Great Oxford debate last week.
A large majority agreed with the motion: “This house believes that medicines deliver net savings to the nation,” while 69 voted against it, following a lively debate in the world famous Oxford Union debating chamber which saw convincing arguments delivered by both sides.
Proposing the motion, Professor Sir Michael Rawlins, Chairman of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), argued that, even allowing for factors such as side-effects and expense, medicines deliver savings in both wealth and health. He listed a catalogue of achievements in recent history, such as the development of antivirals to help people live longer with HIV. "We don't need a sophisticated economic model to see that medicines have delivered massive savings," he stressed.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze