By Dr Nicola Davies
For over two decades, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has encouraged the incorporation of patient perspectives into drug development. A major component of the patient perspective is a drug’s effect on Quality of Life (QoL) – a concept that has always been a heterogeneous entity that lacks clear definition.
The FDA suggests that QoL is ‘an abstract, multidimensional concept, which defines a patient’s satisfaction with life in specific domains that they consider significant.’ QoL is best assessed through patient-reported outcomes (PROs), which are direct reports from the patient on their health and functional status. Most clinical trials today collect PROs as a routine part of their outcome assessment; however, there is no clear guidance on the analysis and interpretation of PROs data. This leaves the pharmaceutical industry with a major question: How much emphasis does the FDA place on QoL outcomes?
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze