The pressure for governments, regulatory agencies and drugmakers to come up with medicines to mitigate or end the coronavirus epidemic is intense, as has been seen on numerous occasions this month alone.
Russia has approved a vaccine despite a complete lack of Phase III data and the US Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Stephen Hahn has been criticised for his comments around the emergency approval of convalescent plasma as a treatment, to name but two.
Now the actions of a trade group representing pharma companies seeking to develop a vaccine for Europe have brought a new issue to the fore – how to deal with the fall-out if a hastily approved product has an adverse impact on patients.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze