An appealing set of options: when should pharma innovators appeal invalidation by the patent office?

4 January 2017
medical_legal_law_big

An inter partes review (IPR) is usually an unpleasant business for a patent owner, writes Greg DeLassus, a principal at international intellectual property (IP) firm Harness Dickey, in an expert view piece  for The Pharma Letter.

This is especially true for the pharmaceutical industry, where 229 of 371 petitions (62%) challenging a patent claim have resulted in an IPR being instituted, and 47% of challenged claims have been destroyed.

Meanwhile, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) only reverses the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) around 20% of the time.

This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free.  A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.

Login to your account

Become a subscriber

 

£820

Or £77 per month

Subscribe Now
  • Unfettered access to industry-leading news, commentary and analysis in pharma and biotech.
  • Updates from clinical trials, conferences, M&A, licensing, financing, regulation, patents & legal, executive appointments, commercial strategy and financial results.
  • Daily roundup of key events in pharma and biotech.
  • Monthly in-depth briefings on Boardroom appointments and M&A news.
  • Choose from a cost-effective annual package or a flexible monthly subscription
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed

Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK

Today's issue

Company Spotlight





More Features in Pharmaceutical