An inter partes review (IPR) is usually an unpleasant business for a patent owner, writes Greg DeLassus, a principal at international intellectual property (IP) firm Harness Dickey, in an expert view piece for The Pharma Letter.
This is especially true for the pharmaceutical industry, where 229 of 371 petitions (62%) challenging a patent claim have resulted in an IPR being instituted, and 47% of challenged claims have been destroyed.
Meanwhile, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) only reverses the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) around 20% of the time.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze