A European Court of Justice ruling on December 5, effectively saying that parallel importing is permitted under European Union single market legislation, came as a shock to the litigants and to the research-based pharmaceutical industry as a whole.
The surprise judgement was in the case of Merck & Co vs Primecrown and Smith-Kline Beecham vs Europharm, and went against the recommendations of European Advocate General Fennelly, who had argued that the previous precedent-setting case of Merck vs Stephar was "flawed" and should be reversed. Primecrown and Europharm wanted to buy unpatented brand-name drugs in countries such as Spain and Portugal where they are sold at a price lower than in other markets where patents are enforced.
Confirmed Exhaustion Principle The Court, however, confirmed that the exhaustion principle did apply where a patent holder could demonstrate that it had legal obligations to market in a specific EU member country, but refused to acknowledge the importance of ethical obligations to ensure patient access to medicines in member states with lower standards of patent protection.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze