FDA delay in safety rule leaves US patients at risk, says Public Citizen

4 December 2015
fda-big

The US Food and Drug Administration’s postponement to July 2016 of a significant patient safety rule leaves open a safety gap for the millions of patients who take generic medications, says consumer advocacy group Public Citizen. The agency proposed the rule in 2013 in response to a 2011 Public Citizen petition.

Currently, brand-name drug manufacturers are permitted to make safety updates without prior FDA approval. But generic manufacturers are not permitted to update warnings to reflect new safety information unless instructed to do so by the FDA.

The FDA’s proposed rule would solve that problem by giving generic drugmakers the option to update labeling to provide warnings about newly discovered risks to patient safety without prior FDA approval – much as brand-name manufacturers have been able to do for nearly 30 years.

The FDA has not yet finalized the labeling rule and has several times delayed its expected completion date. In its recently issued regulatory agenda, the FDA has now pushed the date back even further, to July 2016.

FDA “should resist” pharma pressure

“The agency should resist pressure from the pharmaceutical industry and finalize a rule that will protect patients,” said Michael Carome, director of the Public Citizen Health Research Group, adding: “The agency should move expeditiously to finalize its proposed rule, which will better protect patients by ensuring they have timely access to updated safety information.”

Under a longstanding FDA rule, adopted in the 1980s at the urging of the pharmaceutical industry, brand-name manufacturers are permitted to make safety updates without prior FDA approval. That rule enables updated warnings to reach physicians and patients as soon as possible. After generics enter the market, however, brand-name market share drops precipitously, and brand-name manufacturers are much less vigilant about labeling updates. Further, brand-name manufacturers often stop making a product for which there is a generic version and, at that point, are not monitoring the product or considering labeling updates.

The FDA’s proposed rule would promote patient safety by extending to generic drug manufacturers the ability to make labeling updates, and by providing a process for other makers of a particular medication promptly to follow suit, Public Citizen contends.

This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free.  A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.

Login to your account

Become a subscriber

 

£820

Or £77 per month

Subscribe Now
  • Unfettered access to industry-leading news, commentary and analysis in pharma and biotech.
  • Updates from clinical trials, conferences, M&A, licensing, financing, regulation, patents & legal, executive appointments, commercial strategy and financial results.
  • Daily roundup of key events in pharma and biotech.
  • Monthly in-depth briefings on Boardroom appointments and M&A news.
  • Choose from a cost-effective annual package or a flexible monthly subscription
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed

Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK

Companies featured in this story

More ones to watch >


Today's issue

Company Spotlight





More Features in Generics