Thanks to Internet chat rooms, patient advocacy web sites and theseemingly endless top-of-the-news stories about breakthrough new cancer therapies, notably Novartis' recently-approved Gleevec (imatinimab mesylate; Marketletter May 21), cancer patients have become increasingly aware of the promise of investigational therapies. And, they have become more demanding about getting a chance to try one of those drugs, no matter how sick they are or how early the product is in the development process.
That has led to a dilemma for pharmaceutical companies and the US Food and Drug Administration in deciding whether patients should get access to experimental drugs under the compassionate use or single-patient Investigational New Drug program. These programs have existed in some form since the 1960s, but the rules about when to grant an individual patient access to a therapy outside of a trial have been fuzzy and subjective, ultimately decided not by the FDA, but by the pharmaceutical company.
AIDS advocates led the way
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze