When doctors may use experimental treatments in the emergency room, without getting the consent of a trauma victim, has been the subject of deliberations between the US Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health.
Consent to an experimental treatment may be waived when the therapy can save someone who cannot physically consent and has no better option, according to the FDA, but the NIH feels that experiments must pose no more risk than the patient would have in daily life.
While FDA Deputy Commissioner Mary Pendergast said the agency wants research to go forward ethically, she added there are no simple answers. The NIH's Gary Ellis said that even dying patients must be protected against unsafe experiments. The government has been asked by researchers to redefine its definition of experiments that are too risky for patients already threatened with death or disability.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze