Switzerland-based Actelion (SIX: ATLN) says that the California Supreme Court has denied the firm’ petition for review of the Court of Appeal's decision affirming the final judgment entered against Actelion in November 2011 in Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp v Actelion Ltd, et al (case S216123; The Pharma Letters passim).
Actelion, Europe’s largest biotech firm, said it is disappointed by the decision and strongly believe there are significant reasons why the Supreme Court should have reviewed the case. The judgment now stands.
The dispute relates to a licensing and development agreement between the two companies regarding Asahi’s fasudil, a potential treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension, being developed by the Japanese firm and CoTherix, which Actelion acquired in 2007. Actelion, whose leading product Tracleer (bosentan) is for the treatment of PAH, dropped further development of fasudil.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze