The USA's Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) could scarcely have been more damning of two companies behind treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), the most common fatal genetic disease diagnosed in childhood.
The ICER was critical of the companies in its earlier evidence report, published last month, and the failure of the firms to engage with the subsequent public meeting may have done their cause further harm.
The USA-based cost-effectiveness watchdog was assessing the comparative clinical effectiveness and value of two exon-skipping therapies, Exondys 51 (eteplirsen) and golodirsen, from Sarepta Therapeutics (Nasdaq: SRPT).
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze