Structuring your investment to protect IP rights – the case of compulsory licensing

21 March 2014

Pharmaceutical companies may obtain additional international law protection against unlawful compulsory licensing by governments, explain Caline Mouawad and Silvia Marchili (partners) and Louis-Alexis Bret (associate) in King & Spalding’s International Arbitration Group, in this exclusive report for The Pharma Letter.

A growing number of countries, including Brazil, Thailand and India, have enabled local drug makers to produce drugs patented by foreign companies under a compulsory license. The term “compulsory license” refers to circumstances in which a government authorizes someone other than the patent owner to produce a patented product or use a patented process without the consent of the patent owner, subject to certain conditions. Although Article 31 of the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS) affords this flexibility to WTO members under certain circumstances related to public health and safety, this mechanism recently has become a major threat for the pharmaceutical industry worldwide. Under compulsory licensing schemes, pharmaceutical companies face the risk of receiving only a drastically reduced royalty for the use of their intellectual property, imperiling in turn their ability to develop profitably new treatments and molecules.

One of the most well-known instances of compulsory licensing was that issued by Brazil, which, in 2007, allowed the manufacture and importation of a generic form of the anti-HIV drug, Efavirenz, without the patent owner’s consent. Other examples are in India, where courts have rendered a number of decisions affirming the use of compulsory licenses affecting large international pharmaceutical companies, and where local authorities have most recently received a request for compulsory licenses for patented diabetes management drugs. Moreover, while a large number of the drugs targeted by compulsory licenses are intended to treat life-threatening conditions, some relate to less critical conditions, thus expanding the scope of the problem considerably.

Pharma sector concern

This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free.  A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.

Login to your account

Become a subscriber

 

£820

Or £77 per month

Subscribe Now
  • Unfettered access to industry-leading news, commentary and analysis in pharma and biotech.
  • Updates from clinical trials, conferences, M&A, licensing, financing, regulation, patents & legal, executive appointments, commercial strategy and financial results.
  • Daily roundup of key events in pharma and biotech.
  • Monthly in-depth briefings on Boardroom appointments and M&A news.
  • Choose from a cost-effective annual package or a flexible monthly subscription
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed

Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK



Today's issue

Company Spotlight





More Features in Pharmaceutical