An Expert View from Fiona Maini, principal, global compliance and strategy at Medidata Solutions, a Dassault Systèmes company.
Remote technology solutions in clinical trials, such as electronic patient diaries, and wearables and sensors, have been around for some time, but it’s taken a few years for wider adoption. These tools enable patients to participate in clinical trials from the comfort of their own home or preferred location, and they reduce the burden associated with partaking in ‘traditional’ trials. In trials using such technologies, also called decentralized clinical trials (DCTs), site visits are limited, which provides patients with some flexibility and tools to alleviate the burden associated with manual reporting, such as of drug intake.
In a post-COVID-19 world, it has become obvious that trials often function better when they use these solutions. Prior to the pandemic, these solutions were not as widely available as they are now, and regulatory guidance on their use was not as extensive. The industry’s approach to clinical trials changed as a result of the pandemic, but how exactly has the pandemic played a role in the wider adoption of remote technology in clinical trials, and how supportive have regulators been?
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze