Researchers find widespread flaws in major oncology trials

20 September 2019
pills_drugs_capsules_pharma_big

New  research published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) finds that many new cancer drug approvals could be based on flawed research.

While most of the European late-stage studies in question were randomized controlled trials (RCT), the researchers found that about half of these could still be at risk of bias, due to a lack of rigor in clinical testing.

The study looked at 54 studies for new oncology drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) between 2014 and 2016, and found that 49% of the RCTs were at risk of bias.

This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free.  A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.

Login to your account

Become a subscriber

 

£820

Or £77 per month

Subscribe Now
  • Unfettered access to industry-leading news, commentary and analysis in pharma and biotech.
  • Updates from clinical trials, conferences, M&A, licensing, financing, regulation, patents & legal, executive appointments, commercial strategy and financial results.
  • Daily roundup of key events in pharma and biotech.
  • Monthly in-depth briefings on Boardroom appointments and M&A news.
  • Choose from a cost-effective annual package or a flexible monthly subscription
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed

Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK

Today's issue

Company Spotlight





More Features in Pharmaceutical