The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review’s (ICER), which styles itself as the USA’s cost-effectiveness watchdog for medicines, has been seeking views on how to improve its value assessment framework and methods.
Never one to hold back, the USA’s main trade group, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) has had its say on behalf of pharma companies.
PhRMA has called itself a strong supporter of value-driven healthcare, including the use of rigorous value frameworks and evidence to support healthcare decision-making, but it has taken issue with certain ICER methodology.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze