New whitepaper finds faults in ICER cost-effectiveness analyses

20 September 2018
icer_big

A new white paper authored by Bruce Pyenson and colleagues from Milliman explains why the US Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) cost-effective analyses (CEAs) will not be very useful for private payers’ medicine coverage decisions.

A summary of the findings was presented on the Pharmaceutical and Research Manufacturers of America by Lauren Neves, a director of policy at PhRMA focusing on the value of cancer medicines, medication adherence, and payment and delivery reform

The whitepaper identifies several problems in applying ICER’s reports to inform coverage decisions by private payers, including:

This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free.  A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.

Login to your account

Become a subscriber

 

£820

Or £77 per month

Subscribe Now
  • Unfettered access to industry-leading news, commentary and analysis in pharma and biotech.
  • Updates from clinical trials, conferences, M&A, licensing, financing, regulation, patents & legal, executive appointments, commercial strategy and financial results.
  • Daily roundup of key events in pharma and biotech.
  • Monthly in-depth briefings on Boardroom appointments and M&A news.
  • Choose from a cost-effective annual package or a flexible monthly subscription
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed

Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK

Today's issue

Company Spotlight





More Features in Pharmaceutical