The German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) has reviewed a number of dossiers to assess whether the drugs offer patients an added benefit over one of the appropriate comparator therapies.
According to the findings on USA-based Dendreon’s (Nasdaq: DNDN) Provenge (sipuleucel-T), an added benefit is not proven: The data on mortality were not evaluable because differences between the treatment groups might have been caused by the circumstances of the subsequent therapies. At the same time, certain side effects such as fever occur more frequently.
Sipuleucel-T is an option for patients whose cancer has already formed metastases and can also no longer be influenced by blocking the hormone testosterone (hormone refractory). Overall, the negative effects do not result in “lesser benefit”, however, because the uncertainty in the outcome “overall survival” is so high that no conclusive weighing is possible. Hence an added benefit of sipuleucel-T versus the appropriate comparator therapy, watchful waiting while maintaining hormone blockade, is not proven, the IQWiG concluded.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze