Advocacy group issues report criticizing role of ICER in US healthcare

10 April 2018
afpa-large

US advocacy group the Institute for Patient Access (IfPA) has released a document criticizing the influence of the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), a Boston, USA-based health economic research group that provides cost-effectiveness analyses of health technologies.

The ICER, which claims to be independent, is financed by a mixture of charitable donations and industry sources. Funding from foundations, which makes up about 80% of the total, comes from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation (LJAF), the Blue Shield of California Foundation and others.

The IfPA report, called “ The ICER Myth” looks at four perceived limitations of ICER’s methodology.

This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free.  A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.

Login to your account

Become a subscriber

 

£820

Or £77 per month

Subscribe Now
  • Unfettered access to industry-leading news, commentary and analysis in pharma and biotech.
  • Updates from clinical trials, conferences, M&A, licensing, financing, regulation, patents & legal, executive appointments, commercial strategy and financial results.
  • Daily roundup of key events in pharma and biotech.
  • Monthly in-depth briefings on Boardroom appointments and M&A news.
  • Choose from a cost-effective annual package or a flexible monthly subscription
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed

Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK



Today's issue

Company Spotlight





More Features in Pharmaceutical