Proposals from a handful of generic medicines companies for the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) to preference generic brands of medicines over others are flawed, says trade group Medicines Australia chief executive Brendan Shaw.
“These proposals argue that substituting originator brands of medicines for generic brands will create savings for the PBS. That proposition is flawed on a number of fronts,” he stated, noting:
First, it is based on the fallacy that generic medicines are cheaper for the government than their branded equivalents. The reality is that the government pays exactly the same price for branded medicines and generic versions. The government will not one cent by protecting one group of manufacturers over another group of manufacturers, he argues.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze