Three therapies for rare disorder HAE are overpriced, says ICER

19 November 2018
2019_biotech_test_vial_discovery_big

Influential cost-effectiveness watchdog ICER - the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review - has found that three therapies for the ultra-rare and potentially fatal disorder hereditary angioedema (HAE) are not cost-effective.

In a “Final Evidence” report, the ICER compares the clinical and economic value of Shire’s (LSE: SHP) Takhzyro (lanadelumab) and Cinryze (C1 esterase inhibitor), and CSL Behring’s Haegarda (C1 esterase inhibitor).

The Boston, USA-based group says that all three therapies “at current pricing, exceed commonly cited thresholds for cost-effectiveness.”

This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free.  A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.

Login to your account

Become a subscriber

 

£820

Or £77 per month

Subscribe Now
  • Unfettered access to industry-leading news, commentary and analysis in pharma and biotech.
  • Updates from clinical trials, conferences, M&A, licensing, financing, regulation, patents & legal, executive appointments, commercial strategy and financial results.
  • Daily roundup of key events in pharma and biotech.
  • Monthly in-depth briefings on Boardroom appointments and M&A news.
  • Choose from a cost-effective annual package or a flexible monthly subscription
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed

Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK

Today's issue

Company Spotlight





More Features in Biotechnology