Influential cost-effectiveness watchdog ICER - the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review - has found that three therapies for the ultra-rare and potentially fatal disorder hereditary angioedema (HAE) are not cost-effective.
In a “Final Evidence” report, the ICER compares the clinical and economic value of Shire’s (LSE: SHP) Takhzyro (lanadelumab) and Cinryze (C1 esterase inhibitor), and CSL Behring’s Haegarda (C1 esterase inhibitor).
The Boston, USA-based group says that all three therapies “at current pricing, exceed commonly cited thresholds for cost-effectiveness.”
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze