Not for the first time, US cost-effectiveness watchdog the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review’s (ICER) and the Institute for Patient Access (IfPA) are at loggerheads.
Their latest conflict concerns the ICER’s Final Evidence Report assessing the comparative clinical effectiveness and value of biologic treatments for asthma associated with type two inflammation and/or allergic asthma.
The report assesses the effectiveness and value of dupilumab (Dupixent, from Sanofi [Euronext: SAN] and Regeneron [Nasdaq: REGN]), omalizumab (Xolair, from Genentech and Novartis [NOVN: VX]), mepolizumab (Nucala, from GlaxoSmithKline [LSE: GSK]), reslizumab (Cinqair, from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries [NYSE: TEVA]), and benralizumab (Fasenra, from AstraZeneca [LSE: AZN]).
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze