In the fifth of a monthly FDA-focused blog published exclusively by The Pharma Letter, Dr Nicola Davies looks at how the FDA weighs up the risk versus the benefits of new drugs for terminally ill patients.
It is painful and traumatic for a patient to be told that they are dying from a terminal illness. This becomes even more unbearable when faced with the discovery that there may be a treatment that could help – but could also do more harm. When faced with death or life-threatening treatment, many patients will opt for treatment, regardless of the potential harm it may cause or whether it is experimental. However, if a drug hasn’t been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, it is for a reason – usually because it could cause more harm than the disease itself, potentially decreasing life expectancy and/or quality of life.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze